- Prof. Graham
- Dr. Havas
- Dr. Hughes
- Dr. Rae
- Dr. Adiel Tel Oren (founder)
About · Contact us · Terms of use · Dr. T
EMF Research Data
Phase II — Single-blind Challenge of 100 Patients
No. of Patients
No. of Active Challenges
No. of Blank Challenges
Positive Reactions to Active Challenges
Positive Reactions to Blanks
50 1050 250 750 150 25 525 125 0 0 25 525 125 325 0
|
Table 2 Phase III — 25 Patients Previously Positive Rechallenged and 25 Controls Tested Double-Blind |
||||
|
No. of Persons |
No. of Active Challenges |
No. of Blank Challenges |
Positive Reactions to Challenges |
Positive Reactions to Blanks |
|
16 patients (out of 25 reacting positively) |
336 | 80 | 179 | 6 |
|
25 controls (none of them reacting positively) |
525 | 125 | 0 | 0 |
|
Table 3 Percentage of 16 Patients with Positive Reaction to Different Frequencies |
|||
| Frequency (Hz) | Patients with Positive Reaction (%) | Frequency (Hz) |
Patients with Positive Reaction (%) |
| 0.1 | 31 | 1K | 56 |
| 0.5 | 44 | 5K | 38 |
| 1.0 | 75 | 10K | 69 |
| 2.5 | 75 | 20K | 56 |
| 5.0 | 69 | 35K | 31 |
| 10.0 | 69 | 50K | 50 |
| 20.0 | 69 | 75K | 50 |
| 40.0 | 50 | 100K | 38 |
| 50.0 | 50 | 1M | 50 |
| 60.0 | 63 | 5M | 31 |
| 100.0 | 56 |
|
|
|
Table 4 Comparison of Symptoms and Signs Induced by Frequencies |
|||||||||||||||
| Hz | # Patients w/pos reaction | Neuro- logical |
Musculo- skeletal |
Cardio- vascular |
Respiratory | Gastro- intestinal |
Eyes | Skin | |||||||
| # of Pts | % | # of Pts | % | # of Pts | % | # of Pts | % | # of Pts | % | # of Pts | % | # of Pts | % | ||
|
0.1 |
5 | 3 | 60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
0.5 |
7 | 4 | 57 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
1 |
12 | 4 | 33 | 3 | 25 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
2.5 |
12 | 5 | 42 | 2 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
5 |
11 | 5 | 46 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 2 | 18 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
10 |
11 | 7 | 64 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
20 |
11 | 4 | 36 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 1 | 9 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
40 |
8 | 4 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 13 |
|
50 |
8 | 5 | 63 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 25 | 1 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
60 |
10 | 5 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 3 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
100 |
9 | 4 | 44 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 2 | 22 | 1 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
1K |
9 | 6 | 67 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 0 | 0 |
|
5K |
6 | 2 | 33 | 1 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
10K |
11 | 4 | 36 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
20K |
9 | 5 | 56 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 22 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 11 |
|
35K |
5 | 2 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 20 |
|
50K |
8 | 2 | 25 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 2 | 25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 13 |
|
75K |
8 | 1 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 3 | 38 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 0 | 0 |
|
100K |
6 | 2 | 33 | 2 | 33 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 33 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
1M |
8 | 4 | 50 | 1 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
5M |
5 | 2 | 40 | 1 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
Table 5 Phase IV—Sixteen Patients Rechallenged to One Active Frequency on Two Separate Episoded and in Addition to Five Blank Challenges on Each Episode—Double-blind |
||||
|
First Episode of Challenge |
||||
|
No. of Patients |
Total No. of Frequencies | Total No. of Blanks |
No. of Patients Reacting to Active Challenge |
No. of Patients Reacting to Blanks |
| 16 | 16 | 80 | 16 | 0 |
|
Second Episode of Challenge |
||||
|
No. 4 of Patients |
Total No. of Frequencies | Total No. of Blanks |
No. of Patients Reacting to Active Challenge |
No. of Patients Reacting to Blanks |
| 16 | 16 | 80 | 16 | 0 |
|
Table 6 Parameters of 25 Normal Controls’ Pupillary Light Reflex—Iriscorder—EHC-Dallas (Right and Left Eyes Combined) |
||||
|
Parameter |
|
x ± SD |
|
% Variation |
|
Al |
5.70 | = | 3.58 | 10.0 |
|
Cr |
0.46 | = | 0.048 | 10.4 |
|
T2 |
190.74 | = | 18.36 | 9.6 |
|
VC |
49.67 | = | 5.86 | 11.8 |
|
AC |
503.20 | = | 75.80 | 15.1 |
|
T5 |
1520.04 | = | 286.86 | 18.7 |
|
VD |
13.65 | = | 2.44 | 17.9 |






